|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login  | |
|
Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/11/2008 1:04:45 AM
|
|
|
ljmac
Posts: 741
Joined: 11/20/2006
Status: offline
|
...and their babies
Pro-lifers like me are repeatedly accused of caring only about changing laws, as if legally protecting human beings was a bad thing. You must wait for hearts and minds to change. You only want to condemn people. You don't care about troubled women. Blah, blah, blah...
As someone who is very much in touch with Crisis Pregnancy Centers (CPCs), I know that Democrats are the opponents of these organizations that try to help women give birth to a live child. In NY, former govenor Elliot Spitzer (D) led the way. Now that they're in power in Congress, abortion loving Democrats (Are there any others?) are attempting to use the same thankfully failed strategy to put CPCs out of business.
NJ Democrat Robert Menendez is the (bloody) point man.
http://www.lifenews.com/nat3833.html
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/11/2008 8:11:52 AM
|
|
|
SonInMe1
Posts: 3550
Joined: 4/16/2005
From: my mom by God
Status: offline
|
Thing is....like gays wanting marriage rights, there already is a law on the books concerning abortion. Its called...murder.
We don't need more laws...we need people to know...its a baby and if you want to kill a baby, then I would suggest some serious mental examinations.
_____________________________
You adulterous people, don't you know that friendship with the world is hatred toward God? Anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God.
James 4:4
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/11/2008 8:16:31 AM
|
|
|
WhiteRoseBlessings
Posts: 25500
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Here, but subject to change . . . stay tuned!
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ljmac
Now that they're in power in Congress, abortion-loving Democrats (Are there any others?) . . . Yes, actually, there are Democrats who are not "abortion-loving".
Please do not generalize.
I'm not a registered Democrat, but I know people who are and who, like me, are very much pro-life and very much anti-abortion.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/11/2008 9:25:25 AM
|
|
|
blessedinnyc
Posts: 1107
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
|
Is there any way we can institute some sort of rule limiting new abortion threads (or any thread on a certain subject) to two per poster per week and have the mods delete all other new threads on that topic by that person?
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/11/2008 10:04:30 AM
|
|
|
rcjames
Posts: 4623
Joined: 7/15/2005
From: Oklahoma
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: blessedinnyc
Is there any way we can institute some sort of rule limiting new abortion threads (or any thread on a certain subject) to two per poster per week and have the mods delete all other new threads on that topic by that person?
Why, does free speech, or trying to save the innocent lives of choldren bother you?
Thanks
RC
_____________________________
Just a country Preacher's humble opinion
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/11/2008 10:06:43 AM
|
|
|
rcjames
Posts: 4623
Joined: 7/15/2005
From: Oklahoma
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: WhiteRoseBlessings
Yes, actually, there are Democrats who are not "abortion-loving".
Please do not generalize.
I'm not a registered Democrat, but I know people who are and who, like me, are very much pro-life and very much anti-abortion.
And are these folks going to vote for Obama or Clinton for president?
That does just not compute.
Thanks
RC
_____________________________
Just a country Preacher's humble opinion
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/11/2008 10:23:45 AM
|
|
|
WhiteRoseBlessings
Posts: 25500
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Here, but subject to change . . . stay tuned!
Status: offline
|
RC, I frankly don't know who they're going to vote for.
Additionally, just because someone is a registered voter of a specific party doesn't mean that they automatically adhere to or agree with all of that party's' philosophies or ideologies. THAT was my point. The OP asked, whether seriously or facetiousely, if there were any other kind of democrats other than those who are "abortion-loving". My post was in reply to that.
< Message edited by WhiteRoseBlessings -- 4/11/2008 10:44:24 AM >
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/11/2008 11:40:29 AM
|
|
|
Random
Posts: 1203
Joined: 4/18/2005
From: Zipperhead
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: rcjames
quote:
ORIGINAL: blessedinnyc
Is there any way we can institute some sort of rule limiting new abortion threads (or any thread on a certain subject) to two per poster per week and have the mods delete all other new threads on that topic by that person?
Why, does free speech, or trying to save the innocent lives of choldren bother you?
Thanks
RC
I don't know what bothers who, but we do have rules about duplicate threads. If there are multiple threads on the same topic, some of them will get locked.
_____________________________
Desmond Hume has come unstuck in time.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/11/2008 11:58:11 AM
|
|
|
ljmac
Posts: 741
Joined: 11/20/2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Random
quote:
ORIGINAL: rcjames
quote:
ORIGINAL: blessedinnyc
Is there any way we can institute some sort of rule limiting new abortion threads (or any thread on a certain subject) to two per poster per week and have the mods delete all other new threads on that topic by that person?
Why, does free speech, or trying to save the innocent lives of choldren bother you?
Thanks
RC
I don't know what bothers who, but we do have rules about duplicate threads. If there are multiple threads on the same topic, some of them will get locked.
There is no other thread about the efforts of Democrats in Congress to put CPCs out of business. If there was, I would have put this in it.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/11/2008 12:04:22 PM
|
|
|
ljmac
Posts: 741
Joined: 11/20/2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: WhiteRoseBlessings
quote:
ORIGINAL: ljmac
Now that they're in power in Congress, abortion-loving Democrats (Are there any others?) . . . Yes, actually, there are Democrats who are not "abortion-loving".
Please do not generalize.
I'm not a registered Democrat, but I know people who are and who, like me, are very much pro-life and very much anti-abortion.
You mean I shouldn't say things like, "typical white people?"
CPCs are charity and compassion on exhibit. That Democrats want to put them out of business is a disgusting display of their persistent war on the unborn. 50 million dead and they're not satisfied.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/11/2008 2:19:12 PM
|
|
|
Marcus.
Posts: 1180
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
|
Why is there no public voice of Dems who are pro-life? The national committee seems to ignore them.
_____________________________
Blessed is He who comes in the Name of the Lord.
Hosea Project Care Net
Google
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/11/2008 4:37:14 PM
|
|
|
blessedinnyc
Posts: 1107
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: rcjames
Why, does free speech, or trying to save the innocent lives of choldren bother you?
Thanks
RC
No, but redundancy does. Can we reach some sort of agreement where ljmac agrees to start only two abortion threads per week in the Current Events forums. I really don't think he's accomplishing much more by posting five per week and honestly, I'm interested in real debates- not someone constantly trying to pick a fight with libruls.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/11/2008 7:18:14 PM
|
|
|
Random
Posts: 1203
Joined: 4/18/2005
From: Zipperhead
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ljmac
There is no other thread about the efforts of Democrats in Congress to put CPCs out of business. If there was, I would have put this in it.
You will note that this thread was not locked, so I was not saying it was redundant. I was responding to rcjames, who wondered why we would limit the number of threads on a topic. It is not about free speech, it is about not littering the boards with redundant threads.
_____________________________
Desmond Hume has come unstuck in time.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/11/2008 7:22:13 PM
|
|
|
Random
Posts: 1203
Joined: 4/18/2005
From: Zipperhead
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: blessedinnyc
No, but redundancy does. Can we reach some sort of agreement where ljmac agrees to start only two abortion threads per week in the Current Events forums. I really don't think he's accomplishing much more by posting five per week and honestly, I'm interested in real debates- not someone constantly trying to pick a fight with libruls.
TOS 19 states:
19. Salem Web Network reserves the right to:
- move any discussion in community areas to a different folder or room for any reason at our sole discretion
- edit any discussion, post, or chat room title for any reason at our sole discretion
Under Moderator Functions it states:
Moderators have the ability to do the following functions.
1. Close Thread. Prevents further replies to a topic or thread. This is done if the thread is a duplicate, if there is nothing constructive to be said on the current subject, or if a thread has been moved to another forum. As an example, threads that are trolling for people to respond will most likely be closed.
So, an additional rule is not needed, one already exists. If you think a thread is redundant to an existing thread, please click the "report post" link on the thread, and tell us. If possible provide a link to the existing thread, please.
_____________________________
Desmond Hume has come unstuck in time.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/12/2008 1:42:10 AM
|
|
|
ljmac
Posts: 741
Joined: 11/20/2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Random
quote:
ORIGINAL: ljmac
There is no other thread about the efforts of Democrats in Congress to put CPCs out of business. If there was, I would have put this in it.
You will note that this thread was not locked, so I was not saying it was redundant. I was responding to rcjames, who wondered why we would limit the number of threads on a topic. It is not about free speech, it is about not littering the boards with redundant threads.
Yes, I noticed. I wasn't arguing or contesting anything you had to say. I was pointing out for all that if a thread of the same topic existed I would have put this there.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/12/2008 2:44:27 AM
|
|
|
ljmac
Posts: 741
Joined: 11/20/2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: blessedinnyc
quote:
ORIGINAL: rcjames
Why, does free speech, or trying to save the innocent lives of choldren bother you?
Thanks
RC
No, but redundancy does. Can we reach some sort of agreement where ljmac agrees to start only two abortion threads per week in the Current Events forums. I really don't think he's accomplishing much more by posting five per week and honestly, I'm interested in real debates- not someone constantly trying to pick a fight with libruls.
First make an agreement to not to misrepresent my posts. As far as I can tell I've started two threads this month. One, this one, was related to abortion, but is primarily about legisation of abortion alternatives. If you want something "honestly," then hold yourself to that standard and don't make outlandish claims that I start "five (abortion threads) per week." But if I did, would those five abortion threads disturb you more than 25,000 abortions done in the same time?
That someone is trying to put CPCs out of business is disgusting. It is not my fault that these are the causes that Democrats ("liburls") have embraced.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/12/2008 1:10:02 PM
|
|
|
Marcus.
Posts: 1180
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
|
And NARAL and PP don't twist the truth of what is growing in women's womb when they go in a clinic? Deception is their stock in trade. Deny it's a child. Deny it's a baby. Deny it's human. Deny it's a separate entity. Call it a tumor-like growth. Call it a lump of flesh. Satan has a strong hold on the folks working for these groups.
< Message edited by Marcus. -- 4/12/2008 1:22:04 PM >
_____________________________
Blessed is He who comes in the Name of the Lord.
Hosea Project Care Net
Google
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/12/2008 1:25:56 PM
|
|
|
Marcus.
Posts: 1180
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
|
Why is it legal to kill someone because of privacy laws when they are in the womb but not some sorry career criminal for example? Why isn't that protected by privacy laws? If the government is supposed to be officially atheist, according to the atheists, why wouldn't they allow in the interests of public safety? Since they use no moral values to make laws?
Maybe we do use moral values, some folks just don't want to admit it.
< Message edited by Marcus. -- 4/12/2008 1:32:42 PM >
_____________________________
Blessed is He who comes in the Name of the Lord.
Hosea Project Care Net
Google
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/12/2008 2:43:12 PM
|
|
|
rlj
Posts: 1422
Joined: 4/14/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
And NARAL and PP don't twist the truth of what is growing in women's womb when they go in a clinic? Deception is their stock in trade. Deny it's a child. Deny it's a baby. Deny it's human. Deny it's a separate entity. Call it a tumor-like growth. Call it a lump of flesh. Satan has a strong hold on the folks working for these groups.
Legally under the laws of the United States that is often correct. Should we as christians twist the truth and stoop ourselves to their level? The truth being that some of these places aren't "clinics" and their purpose sometimes (but not always) isn't to help the women but to preach to them. Now that isn't neccessarily a bad thing and it's probably a good thing - however sometimes it is done wrongly. It is dishonest to put yourself in the phone book or claim you are a "clinic" when you are not. I guess since this is abortion then we can do whatever we want. Since we disregard doing things better than the world does them the world is now making a case to get some of these shut down. Had some of these clinics not disregarded the truth (and I say some not all, not even a majority, or half but a few) there wouldn't be much of a case for this legislation.
In the last 20 years I've seen the rights of pro-lifers whittle away as I've seen the movement compromise the very same scriptural principals it claims to uphold. Is there a correlation?
_____________________________
And the money says 'In God We Trust' but it's against the law to pray in schools... don't ask me for the answers I've only got one, that a man leaves his darkness when he follows the Son.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/12/2008 3:02:38 PM
|
|
|
Marcus.
Posts: 1180
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
|
I posted what I did because NARAL and their cronies love tossing that out there as if they don't, as if they are morally superior. They have all the morality of a serial killer. They will pay with their souls for what they do.
In regards to crisis pregnancy centers, I don't see how being a 'clinic' makes them appear to be a baby killing factory like NARAL/PP. From what I've read NARAL instigated the legislation to try to close all non-abortion pregnancy centers.
< Message edited by Marcus. -- 4/12/2008 3:09:20 PM >
_____________________________
Blessed is He who comes in the Name of the Lord.
Hosea Project Care Net
Google
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/12/2008 3:44:53 PM
|
|
|
rlj
Posts: 1422
Joined: 4/14/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
Have you been reading the PP propaganda?
Read some from both sides actually. I can get more accurate assessments of the Iraq war from John Murtha then I can get from either PP or the Pro-Life side on abortion anymore. While I expect that from the PP side why should I expect it from the Pro-Life side?
The dishonesty isn't about what you said most of it I agree with. There is an awful lot of dishonesty when the Pro-Choice side misrepresents these clinics. It doesn't change the fact though that there are some clinics and some people on the pro-life side who do distort the facts.
quote:
In regards to crisis pregnancy centers, I don't see how being a 'clinic' makes them appear to be a baby killing factory like NARAL/PP.
Then what is a clinic? The implication to me of a clinic is a facility where some kind of medical service is rendered.
_____________________________
And the money says 'In God We Trust' but it's against the law to pray in schools... don't ask me for the answers I've only got one, that a man leaves his darkness when he follows the Son.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Democrats vs Pregnant Women - 4/12/2008 4:03:50 PM
|
|
|
Marcus.
Posts: 1180
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
|
The only misrepresentation I could think of is the one where the mom thinks she can get an abortion just because the name says crisis pregnancy center.
_____________________________
Blessed is He who comes in the Name of the Lord.
Hosea Project Care Net
Google
|
|
|
|
 New Messages |
 No New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
 Locked w/ New Messages |
 Locked w/o New Messages |
|
 Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|
Forum Tools
Printable Version
