iBelieve.com Forums
iBelieve Forums on Faith Community Network
  Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 
  Sponsor

John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide....

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events >> Election 2008 >> John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide....
Jump to post #:
Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/3/2008 10:36:49 PM   
thomas2008


Posts: 314
Joined: 9/10/2007
From: Potterville, Michigan
Status: offline
VIDEO HERE


In the San Francisco Chronicle (8/20/99) McCain sided with the pro-abortion camp, suggesting that overturning Roe v. Wade would lead to illegal abortions. Realizing, however, that he could not inveigle the GOP nomination with such views, McCain more recently has resold himself as pro-life, even saying he would support the South Dakota ban. What are Americans to believe? He either is pro-choice or lacks any real conviction on the subject.


_____________________________

Warmest Regards,
Thomas Winters

quote:

"Government is not reason, it is not eloquence -- it is force." - George Washington
Post #: 1
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/3/2008 11:14:29 PM   
Lizahana

 

Posts: 831
Joined: 4/20/2005
Status: offline
You're a brave man, thomas2008 - be prepared.

I agree McCain is wishy-washy on this subject. Which is why, on a presidential level, IMHO, the issue of abortion is a moot issue. McCain has not promised he'd use an anti-abortion litmus test on SCJ nominees. But, you'll get every excuse in the book why he is the best candidate on this issue, when he cannot promise to tow this issue...

Peace and God bless,
Post #: 2
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/3/2008 11:58:51 PM   
Leon_Figg3


Posts: 530
Joined: 4/24/2005
Status: offline
Why must we decide for ourselves whether McCain, or any other candidate is pro-life or pro-abortion?

Why must we decide who we are going to vote for based on only one issue?

Being a head of state, or choosing a head of state requires that the candidate and the voters not only look at all the issues but the candidate and his apparent philosophy about government, and an individual's role in it either as a voter or a candidatre for the highest public office in the land.

In our form of government being the head of state really does not give an individual anymore ability to change things than anyone else because that is not what his branch of government is solely about. No matter what the individual believes he has to play the game of politics/ fight the battles in Congress as he works towards getting laws passed and making the changes that he feels needs to be made.

IMO McCain's view of the Constitution and the kinds of judges he plans to appoint to that high court is more important than whether or not that as a candidate, or a head of state he is either for or against a specific issue such as abortion.

_____________________________

To whom much is given, much is expected. Luke 12:48
Post #: 3
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/4/2008 7:59:32 AM   
thomas2008


Posts: 314
Joined: 9/10/2007
From: Potterville, Michigan
Status: offline
That's funny that you put McCain and the Constitution in the same subject, because he hasn't (unless I've missed it) mentioned anything about it. Now his wishy washy on the abortion issue is important to look at, because it can tell what kind of leader he will be on the other issues, how consistent is he?

And when wonder what judges he will appoint, probably the same ones with a twisted view on America as he has. Obama isn't any better either, I know.

As a Christian, I personally can't see anyone, other than someone from a third party worth voting for. I have looked at Chuck Baldwin from the Constitution Party.

When voting we need to ask ourselves, what would Jesus do? Well, Jesus probably wouldn't vote at all.

_____________________________

Warmest Regards,
Thomas Winters

quote:

"Government is not reason, it is not eloquence -- it is force." - George Washington
Post #: 4
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/4/2008 10:48:09 AM   
Leon_Figg3


Posts: 530
Joined: 4/24/2005
Status: offline
thomas2008,
I was addressing the topic of the discussion and, in a small way, calling attention to the fact that at this point the most any president, or presidential candiate can do as far as abortion is concerned is to recommend the appointment of judges to the SC that will make decisions about abortion that line up with the spirit and letter of the Constitution.

IMO, to many of us that would mean that since abortion can not be judged as falling under any real interpretation of our a citizen's un-alienable rights, the matter will be sent back to the individual states to be decided, at the very least.
McCain has announced that that is exactly what he will do.

_____________________________

To whom much is given, much is expected. Luke 12:48
Post #: 5
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/4/2008 2:12:11 PM   
ljmac

 

Posts: 961
Joined: 11/20/2006
Status: offline
Ignorance on parade.

Myth 1: It doesn't matter who is president: According to liberal athiest Nat Hentoff, the Hyde (R) amendment has saved over one million lives alone. Democrats who love legalized butchering of the unborn can't wait to repeal it and have a President cooperate.

Myth 2: John McCain is weak on abortion. If someone can name a restriction on abortion that McCain voted against, I'd like to see it. He has decades worth of pro-life abortion votes. He's been on the record multiple times in favor of repealing Death Roe, he's only questioned the timing.

Myth 3: Chuck Baldwin is worthy of a vote for President. He won't win his home state, his home county, his home town or even his own neighborhood.


Here is what NARAL has to say about John McCain. "...served in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1983 to 1986 and in the U.S. Senate from 1987 to present...Rep. McCain cast 11 votes on abortion and other reproductive-rights issues. Ten of these votes were anti-choice...Sen. McCain has cast 119 votes on abortion and other reproductive-rights issues, 115 of which were anti-choice."

baby killers hate McCain

On the other hand, NARAL loves Obama bin Laden, who has scored 100% every year for naral. "Sen. Obama is fully pro-choice."

baby killers love B.O.
Post #: 6
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/4/2008 2:50:12 PM   
saved9201

 

Posts: 571
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ljmac

Ignorance on parade.



You're hilarious.

We are so beneath you and unworthy of your presence. I wonder why you even bother to put up with us ignorant imbeciles?

-Julius
Post #: 7
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/5/2008 12:29:09 PM   
Jhud


Posts: 7059
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
While I think McCain is imperfect with regards to abortion, he is right where it counts (the courts) and consistent in his support of anti-abortion legislation - and of course far superior to the opposition in this regard.

_____________________________

Jack

“I mean to live my life an obedient man, but obedient to God, subservient to the wisdom of my ancestors; never to the authority of political truths arrived at yesterday at the voting booth”
William F. Buckley Jr. 1925-2008
Post #: 8
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/5/2008 3:07:15 PM   
rlj


Posts: 1797
Joined: 4/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Myth 1: It doesn't matter who is president: According to liberal athiest Nat Hentoff, the Hyde (R) amendment has saved over one million lives alone. Democrats who love legalized butchering of the unborn can't wait to repeal it and have a President cooperate.


So what convinces you that McCain will be able to sign some bit of pro-life legislation that really hasn't been done on the federal level since 1976? It wasn't McCain after all who co-sponsored the Brownback bill it was Kennedy. It is estimated that 13% of abortions in the US today are because of believed genetic problems with the baby and this bill would allow all of the pro-life christians in the country to adopt every single one of those babies which means it COULD POTENTIALLY be more effective by around 1000% then Dubyas partial birth abortion law which only impacts about 1.3%.

_____________________________

-Roger

1 Thess 5:20 do not treat prophecies with contempt. 21 Test everything. Hold on to the good. (NIV)
Post #: 9
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/5/2008 9:21:56 PM   
Jhud


Posts: 7059
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
While I am not sure what legislation you are talking about, the simple fact is if willingness to adopt had any effect on willingness to abort, there would be no abortions.

_____________________________

Jack

“I mean to live my life an obedient man, but obedient to God, subservient to the wisdom of my ancestors; never to the authority of political truths arrived at yesterday at the voting booth”
William F. Buckley Jr. 1925-2008
Post #: 10
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/5/2008 11:03:03 PM   
rlj


Posts: 1797
Joined: 4/14/2005
Status: offline
The Brownback-Kennedy bill would create a database of couples willing to adopt a child with some kind of genetic defect. Here is something I dug up on a blog, I first heard of it around the turn of the year:

quote:

According to Brownback’s office, the bill would provide for:

* The expansion and further development of a national clearinghouse of information for parents of children with disabilities to assist parents with either a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis;
* The expansion and further development of national and local peer-support programs for families of children with disabilities; and
* The creation of a national registry of families willing to adopt children with disabilities.


I'm not exactly sure what its status is right now. It's been changed around some in the last year or so. Here is a link but not the only one, I'm sorry that all I have are "blog" type entries and I really don't know who this woman is:

http://www.patriciaebauer.com/2008/03/01/kennedy-brownback-bill-passes-senate-committee/

Here is another from a newspaper when the main idea behind the bill was Down's syndrome:

quote:

"I could have had the test, but I didn't want it because I knew that it wouldn't have mattered," Sawyer said. "I would have had this baby anyway. What she has given us in our lives is a new perspective."

But Sawyer's view is not typical of most parents who receive a diagnosis of Down syndrome. Doctors estimate that 80 to 90 percent of women who learn they are carrying a fetus with the genetic disorder decide not to have the child.

That could change if Congress passes a bill that is an unusual collaboration between Sens. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., and Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., lawmakers with diametrically opposite views on abortion.


http://www.boston.com/news/education/k_12/articles/2007/11/29/brownback_kennedy_collaborating_on_down_syndrome_bill/

_____________________________

-Roger

1 Thess 5:20 do not treat prophecies with contempt. 21 Test everything. Hold on to the good. (NIV)
Post #: 11
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/6/2008 12:45:47 AM   
Jhud


Posts: 7059
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
Well, again, while I think the effort is wonderful, there is no reason to believe McCain would oppose such a measure, and considering millions of perfectly healthy babies are aborted every year despite the incredible demand from families willing to adopt, sadly there is little reason to think such a bill will change the attitudes of women who all too often think of abortion as a convenience.

_____________________________

Jack

“I mean to live my life an obedient man, but obedient to God, subservient to the wisdom of my ancestors; never to the authority of political truths arrived at yesterday at the voting booth”
William F. Buckley Jr. 1925-2008
Post #: 12
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/6/2008 1:09:55 AM   
saved9201

 

Posts: 571
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jhud

...sadly there is little reason to think such a bill will change the attitudes of women who all too often think of abortion as a convenience.


So what type of bill or legislation would change their attitudes, if that's the goal? And how would a McCain presidency facilitate getting such legislation passed?

- Julius
Post #: 13
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/6/2008 1:17:15 AM   
Jhud


Posts: 7059
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
quote:

So what type of bill or legislation would change their attitudes, if that's the goal? And how would a McCain presidency facilitate getting such legislation passed?


I don't think legislation is particularly good at changing attitudes. There are already hundreds of thousands of people willing to adopt unwanted babies (John and Cindy McCain apparently being some of them) - that has seemed to lessen abortion at all. The only thing that would seem to have that effect is to allow legislatures to remove it as an option - and it will require a chnge in the courts to do that.

_____________________________

Jack

“I mean to live my life an obedient man, but obedient to God, subservient to the wisdom of my ancestors; never to the authority of political truths arrived at yesterday at the voting booth”
William F. Buckley Jr. 1925-2008
Post #: 14
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/6/2008 7:13:56 AM   
rlj


Posts: 1797
Joined: 4/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Well, again, while I think the effort is wonderful, there is no reason to believe McCain would oppose such a measure, and considering millions of perfectly healthy babies are aborted every year despite the incredible demand from families willing to adopt, sadly there is little reason to think such a bill will change the attitudes of women who all too often think of abortion as a convenience.


I don't believe McCain would oppose such a measure I'm sure he'd sign off on it as soon as it hit his desk. The point to me is so little legislation makes it to the desk of a president to sign from an Executive Branch standpoint how much does it really matter other than as a barometer of his character in what he says he would do?

I was also point out that there hasn't been any real significant legislation signed anyway since the Hyde amendment in 1976 excluding the continuation version in the late '90s that was an amendment that Clinton signed until the partial birth ban. Lastly as LJ conveniently pointed out over and over again that every democrat will only vote for legislation that brutally sucks the brains out of babies and I was pointing out that this bill was the opposite and it 1)co-sponsored by a liberal and 2)NARAL didn't oppose it or at least in its early versions.

One hope of this particular bill though is there are many couple's who would never think of aborting who would abort a baby with Down's Syndrome. It is the purpose of the bill to help those couples be more informed and to make sure they know that if they have this baby there are people that would take care of it. I don't lump the women together who have abortions as "baby killing butchers and murderers" there are many reasons for abortion. 13% of them are from people who followed their prenatal schedule of care and a problem came up. If the 13% of the women who abort for this reason didn't care they would just abort in the first place. The purpose of this legislation is to give them hope so that perhaps they will carry these children to full term and show others that they can to. Many of the people doing this don't have the Hope that you are I do or they wouldn't do this in the first place.

_____________________________

-Roger

1 Thess 5:20 do not treat prophecies with contempt. 21 Test everything. Hold on to the good. (NIV)
Post #: 15
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/7/2008 12:24:29 PM   
ljmac

 

Posts: 961
Joined: 11/20/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: saved9201

quote:

ORIGINAL: ljmac

Ignorance on parade.



You're hilarious.

We are so beneath you and unworthy of your presence. I wonder why you even bother to put up with us ignorant imbeciles?

-Julius


Intelligent people can be ignorant.
Post #: 16
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/7/2008 12:31:31 PM   
ljmac

 

Posts: 961
Joined: 11/20/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rlj

quote:

Myth 1: It doesn't matter who is president: According to liberal athiest Nat Hentoff, the Hyde (R) amendment has saved over one million lives alone. Democrats who love legalized butchering of the unborn can't wait to repeal it and have a President cooperate.


So what convinces you that McCain will be able to sign some bit of pro-life legislation that really hasn't been done on the federal level since 1976? It wasn't McCain after all who co-sponsored the Brownback bill it was Kennedy. It is estimated that 13% of abortions in the US today are because of believed genetic problems with the baby and this bill would allow all of the pro-life christians in the country to adopt every single one of those babies which means it COULD POTENTIALLY be more effective by around 1000% then Dubyas partial birth abortion law which only impacts about 1.3%.


Thanks to Republicans plenty of pro-life legislation has been passed and pro-life policies have been enacted that Democrats hate. Just off the top of my head.
- Mexico City policy
- Lacy and Conner Peterson law
- Born alive infant protection
- Threats of and actual veto of legislation poisoned by Democrat's lust for abortion.
- UN policies

If elected President, Barak H. Obama will make it much easier to kill the unborn, particularily poor brown and black children. He'll increase funding of abortion providers in foreign countries and encourage pro-abortion policies at the UN. McCain will continue Republican policies to protect these children.
Post #: 17
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/7/2008 4:46:41 PM   
rlj


Posts: 1797
Joined: 4/14/2005
Status: offline
The "Lacy and Conner Peterson" law wasn't an abortion bill it also only applies to crimes that can be prosecuted at a federal level. At the time this was passed there were already 34 states with such laws on the books that basically were the same thing as this. So the practical net effect is that some crimes committed in 16 states in which a child in-utero is killed can now be prosecuted.

The "Mexico City Policy" while a good thing doesn't challenge Roe v. Wade.

I'm not sure what you mean by "UN policies". I don't know how veto power on the security council translates to a halt to the UN population control methods unless they suggest using military weapons to control the earths population. As to how US money donated to the UN gets spent this is moot anyway. They'll take the money we won't let them spend on abortion put it somewhere else and take that money and spend it on abortion.

I agree with you on the Born Alive bill.

Well another decade gone with a Republican appointed SCOTUS majority and another decade of Roe v. Wade not being challenged or overturned. Maybe if they added another 47 SCOTUS justices and Republicans could get 41 appointed then MAYBE we'd have a chance of getting this overturned? Nah, had 6 years of 2 branches of federal government controlled by Republicans who like to "talk the talk" but when it comes time to actually do something meaningful about this don't seem too interested in "walking the walk".

_____________________________

-Roger

1 Thess 5:20 do not treat prophecies with contempt. 21 Test everything. Hold on to the good. (NIV)
Post #: 18
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/7/2008 4:50:57 PM   
Jhud


Posts: 7059
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
quote:

Well another decade gone with a Republican appointed SCOTUS majority and another decade of Roe v. Wade not being challenged or overturned. Maybe if they added another 47 SCOTUS justices and Republicans could get 41 appointed then MAYBE we'd have a chance of getting this overturned? Nah, had 6 years of 2 branches of federal government controlled by Republicans who like to "talk the talk" but when it comes time to actually do something meaningful about this don't seem too interested in "walking the walk".


While there is no guarantee a justice will faithfully rule the way one desires, the fact is Obama will never appoint a justice that will lessen Roe in anyway, and his administration will only reverse those small gains made for life under Bush.

_____________________________

Jack

“I mean to live my life an obedient man, but obedient to God, subservient to the wisdom of my ancestors; never to the authority of political truths arrived at yesterday at the voting booth”
William F. Buckley Jr. 1925-2008
Post #: 19
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/7/2008 5:20:52 PM   
ljmac

 

Posts: 961
Joined: 11/20/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rlj

The "Lacy and Conner Peterson" law wasn't an abortion bill it also only applies to crimes that can be prosecuted at a federal level. At the time this was passed there were already 34 states with such laws on the books that basically were the same thing as this. So the practical net effect is that some crimes committed in 16 states in which a child in-utero is killed can now be prosecuted.

The "Mexico City Policy" while a good thing doesn't challenge Roe v. Wade.

I'm not sure what you mean by "UN policies". I don't know how veto power on the security council translates to a halt to the UN population control methods unless they suggest using military weapons to control the earths population. As to how US money donated to the UN gets spent this is moot anyway. They'll take the money we won't let them spend on abortion put it somewhere else and take that money and spend it on abortion.

I agree with you on the Born Alive bill.

Well another decade gone with a Republican appointed SCOTUS majority and another decade of Roe v. Wade not being challenged or overturned. Maybe if they added another 47 SCOTUS justices and Republicans could get 41 appointed then MAYBE we'd have a chance of getting this overturned? Nah, had 6 years of 2 branches of federal government controlled by Republicans who like to "talk the talk" but when it comes time to actually do something meaningful about this don't seem too interested in "walking the walk".


The pro-life SC justices were all appointed by Republicans. Democrats have appointed only pro-abortion justices.

Nobody has ever maintained that all Republicans are pro-life. Gerald Ford certainly wasn't and he appointed one of the SC justices. Reagan also appointed a justice who turned out to be pro-Death Roe, but I believe that was only after Robert Bork was smeared.

Nat Hentoff, an athiest and strong liberal, believes that Republicans have saved over a million babies by the Hyde Amendment alone. Their lives are "meaningful."
Post #: 20
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/7/2008 10:01:39 PM   
rlj


Posts: 1797
Joined: 4/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Nat Hentoff, an athiest and strong liberal, believes that Republicans have saved over a million babies by the Hyde Amendment alone. Their lives are "meaningful."


Which is why I said they haven't passed any meaningful legislation since except perhaps the partial birth ban.

quote:

While there is no guarantee a justice will faithfully rule the way one desires, the fact is Obama will never appoint a justice that will lessen Roe in anyway, and his administration will only reverse those small gains made for life under Bush.


Which honestly causes me to doubt the competence or honesty of Republicans when it comes to Justices. A dem can depend on one of their own judges but in the spirit of Forrest Gump "Republican appointed SCOTUS justices are like a box of chocolates you never know just what you're going to get.

The one thing that I will praise Dubya for is his 2 justices are excellent.

_____________________________

-Roger

1 Thess 5:20 do not treat prophecies with contempt. 21 Test everything. Hold on to the good. (NIV)
Post #: 21
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/7/2008 10:47:10 PM   
Jhud


Posts: 7059
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
quote:

Which honestly causes me to doubt the competence or honesty of Republicans when it comes to Justices. A dem can depend on one of their own judges but in the spirit of Forrest Gump "Republican appointed SCOTUS justices are like a box of chocolates you never know just what you're going to get.

The one thing that I will praise Dubya for is his 2 justices are excellent.


Well, you have to remember that justices are groomed, and it has only been in the last couple of decades or so that conservatives have really focused on the courts (something liberals have been doing for several decades); Alito and Roberts are the result of the movement to produce conservative justices - there are more like them out there.

_____________________________

Jack

“I mean to live my life an obedient man, but obedient to God, subservient to the wisdom of my ancestors; never to the authority of political truths arrived at yesterday at the voting booth”
William F. Buckley Jr. 1925-2008
Post #: 22
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/8/2008 7:17:23 AM   
Lizahana

 

Posts: 831
Joined: 4/20/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ljmac
The pro-life SC justices were all appointed by Republicans. Democrats have appointed only pro-abortion justices.


Republicans also appointed pro-choice SCJ O' Connor (apptd by Reagan).

And both SCJ Souter (Bush I) and SCJ Kennedy (Reagan) were highly lauded by conservatives back in the day. However, Souter usually votes with the liberal wing, and Kennedy, in 1992 in Casey v Planned Parenthood, gave the deciding vote to uphold RVW. His vote could have reversed RVW - but he voted to uphold it.

So, as rlj pointed out, you do never know what you're going to get. SCJ nominations, then, is a rather moot issue, IMHO.

Peace and God bless,

< Message edited by Lizahana -- 7/8/2008 7:36:33 AM >
Post #: 23
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/8/2008 12:27:07 PM   
ljmac

 

Posts: 961
Joined: 11/20/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rlj

quote:

Nat Hentoff, an athiest and strong liberal, believes that Republicans have saved over a million babies by the Hyde Amendment alone. Their lives are "meaningful."


Which is why I said they haven't passed any meaningful legislation since except perhaps the partial birth ban.

quote:

While there is no guarantee a justice will faithfully rule the way one desires, the fact is Obama will never appoint a justice that will lessen Roe in anyway, and his administration will only reverse those small gains made for life under Bush.


Which honestly causes me to doubt the competence or honesty of Republicans when it comes to Justices. A dem can depend on one of their own judges but in the spirit of Forrest Gump "Republican appointed SCOTUS justices are like a box of chocolates you never know just what you're going to get.

The one thing that I will praise Dubya for is his 2 justices are excellent.


The Mexico City Policy, which is only a Republican policy, has dried up US funds for foreign agencies that murder the unborn. While it is difficult to quantify, certainly there are plenty of black and brown people that owe their lives to Republican presidents Reagan, GHWB and GWB. How many will face execution if B.O. is elected?
Post #: 24
RE: John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide.... - 7/8/2008 4:51:23 PM   
blessedinnyc

 

Posts: 1592
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rlj

The one thing that I will praise Dubya for is his 2 justices are excellent.

What do you think of their decisions on due process?

They're certainly not libertarians.
Post #: 25
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events >> Election 2008 >> John McCain: Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion? You decide....
Jump to post #:
Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to: