|
TheCleric -> RE: Godmen (4/5/2007 7:30:52 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: notmycity quote:
ORIGINAL: TheCleric NotMyCity, But hey, what was I thinking, let's just dismiss it outright. I wonder what the Jews thought of the New Testament when they read it? Heresy? Or do they agree with parts and messages while disagreeing with the divinity of Jesus? Apples and oranges. The NT is Scripture. Speaking of Scripture, there was a time when God’s Word alone was the only rule of faith for the believer. 2 Tim 3:16-17 16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works. According to 2 Timothy 3:16-17, Scripture is ALL that is needed. "Speaking of Scripture, there was a time when God’s Word alone was the only rule of faith for the believer. According to 2 Timothy 3:16-17, Scripture is ALL that is needed." Ok...why then do you underscore each of your posts with a C.S. Lewis quote, which I assume you picked to illustrate your beliefs? Hey, don't get me wrong, you picked a great author, whom I assume you've read (so have I). However, (you knew it was coming) if scripture is all that is needed, then why pick C.S. Lewis (I tried looking for the Gospel according to Lewis but no dice). "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:" Tim 3:16 I understand that the scripture is given by the inspiration of God (the Greek textus receptus right). I mean Erasmus's text is the basis for virtually every bible in existence today. The bible is experienced through the lens of the reader. Your experience of the Bible is arguable different from say, an 80 yr old Polish woman, a 16 year old inner city youth, or even mine. I am not a fundamentalist, I do not believe that the lessons of the bible are to be taken absoutely litterally, more metaphorically (i.e. did God create the Earth in 7, 24 hour periods of time?). Wait let me say it....wait for it....apostate I think you also need to account that man is fallible. Man recieved the word, wrote it, it was transcribed, reprinted and re-interpreted from language to language and time period to time period. Can we TRULY translate a Greek text written c. 1522? I am not a Greek linguist, nor was I alive in the 1500s. I can only experience the bible through the lens of my life, and my time with God. One last thing. I assume you attend church regularly (I confess that I don't). At that service there is typically a sermon or homily? I mean a time where the priets, padre, pastor, etc discusses passages of the bible. Isn't he/she typically relating passages to our every day lives? Their interpretation of the passages read during the mass or service, their application of the message to our lives. Why is this discussion going on if the scripture is all we need? Why are there countless bible studies held at churches (even yours I bet) to read, interpret, and discuss the scripture? I think it would be reasonable that 2 different groups might, just might, apply the message in a single passage in very different ways. Oh heck lets just dismiss them...(apostate, whoops said it again), its much easier. De profundis clamo ad te domine TheCleric
|
|
|
|