|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login | |
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/17/2008 3:08:16 PM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 717
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
You'd be surprised just how many do! No I would not. quote:
Let's take a small minority and just stereotype shall we! Most of those that think this way are AMERICAN by birth as well. Born in CA, AZ, NM & TX. Not stereotyping any more than you are. quote:
That was the same garbage people were spewing in the 1970's with the Chicano movement. Almost 40 years later it's still not closer to reality. 5 years to the formation of a strong claim, with a representative flag of a "mexican palestine", that is my prediction based on study and observation. Hope to be proved wrong. But to your mention of the 70's, since you brought it up, would you post a comparison to the 70's and today to the number of illegals in the U.S, tax burden, demand for bi-lingual eduction, demand for representation though illegally in the country, growth of pro mexican reconquista movement and all other factors. Has it grown, reduced or stayed the same? If what you refered to were garbage, logic would seem to say it has stayed the same or reduced. But talk slow to me if you would. As you pointed out I am from a small town and not diversified like you from the big city. quote:
BTW, there are many "white power" movements in America like the KKK and the Aryan nation that don't represent the views of most white people too! Just like these extremist groups don't represent your average hispanic immigrant views Will agree to some point but as one who used to live in Mexico I will have to dsiagree also. Statement is too broad God Bless America
< Message edited by TomTurn -- 4/17/2008 3:23:17 PM >
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/17/2008 3:24:55 PM
|
|
|
earthless
Posts: 4145
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: where thawing pigeons reside...
Status: online
|
TomTurn, Why do you keep posting the flag that some idiots did indeed fly? I ask why because no one in this thread has come against the U.S. nor has anyone spoused any of the anti-American rhetoric that some indeed do hold to. What I am trying to say is that there is a middle ground to what I know you believe (because I do agree with much of what you're saying). Did you have a chance to watch the YouTube clip I shared on the first page?
_____________________________
Probing Today's Religious Movements | Promoting Doctrinal Discernment & Critical Thinking | Providing Reasons for Christian Faith & Ethics
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/17/2008 3:26:55 PM
|
|
|
mapachito13
Posts: 1068
Joined: 10/1/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TomTurn 5 years to the formation of a strong claim, with a representative flag of a "mexican palestine", that is my prediction based on study and observation. Hope to be proved wrong. But to your mention of the 70's, since you brought it up, would you post a comparison to the 70's and today to the number of illegals in the U.S, tax burden, demand for bi-lingual eduction, demand for representation though illegally in the country, growth of pro mexican reconquista movement and all other factors. Has it grown, reduced or stayed the same? The extremist Chicano movement has actually lost steam. People are more into pride of their heritage than into a seccessionist movement. I am not saying that the crazies don't exist I'm just saying that they are being marginalized more. But the crazies are what get the news coverage giving the rest of the nation a false picture. quote:
Will agree to some point but as one who used to live in Mexico I will have to dsiagree also. Statement is too broad. What part do you disagree with? I'd love to hear of your experiences living in Mexico. We could compare that with what my family and I have experienced. BTW, are the results of your "extensive study" published? Or does "study" mean "from my personal experience and reading the news."
_____________________________
Three Nails to protect us!
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/17/2008 7:32:38 PM
|
|
|
tracydolls
Posts: 744
Joined: 3/30/2008
From: Mpls, MN
Status: offline
|
quote:
Some of the posts here remind of THIS... Good video, there is no reason for white supremecy.
_____________________________
1Co 7:22 For he that is called in the Lord, being a servant, is the Lord's freeman: likewise also he that is called, being free, is Christ's servant.
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/17/2008 8:02:31 PM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 717
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
Why do you keep posting the flag that some idiots did indeed fly? It is a good representation of what many have in their heart and mind in the context of this discussion of a "Mexican Palestine" quote:
What I am trying to say is that there is a middle ground to what I know you believe (because I do agree with much of what you're saying). There is no middle ground when it comes to our border and our soverignty. Either the border is there or it is not. I am all for legal crossings whether to be a citizen or day worker. But the border must be honored. Mexico on a whole does not honor it. It is a grudge that has festered since the 1840's and I see it coming to a head. quote:
Did you have a chance to watch the YouTube clip I shared on the first page? Have seen it before and am fimiliar with Tim Wise (he reminds me of that character from the movie airplane who keeps talking about himself and to get away from him others hang themselves). In this tape he is incorrect on many things, to highlight two would be the Civil War and the suppression of wages. ..... Once again, 5 years, new flag as a representaion of a claimed "Mexican Palestine". If you find it hard to believe how can anyone at the same time believe that once the correct percentage is reached muslims will demand sharia, etc.? We have seen that to be the true case.
< Message edited by TomTurn -- 4/17/2008 10:20:48 PM >
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/17/2008 8:16:24 PM
|
|
|
mapachito13
Posts: 1068
Joined: 10/1/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TomTurn There is no middle ground when it comes to our border and our soverignty. Either the border is there or it is not. I am all for legal crossings whether to be a citizen or day worker. But the border must be honored. Mexico on a whole does not honor it. It is a grudge that has festered since the 1840's and I see it coming to a head. Once again, 5 years, new flag as a representaion of a claimed "Mexican Palestine". If you find it hard to believe how can anyone at the same time believe that once the correct percentage is reached muslims will demand sharia, etc.? We have seen that to be the true case. General John J. Pershing in his zealous pursuit of Pancho Villa breached the Mexican border in 1916-1917. This being after the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo in 1848 establishing the present borders between the two countries. The Mexican Army has never breached the border since 1848. Now tell me whose respecting the sovreignty of another nation more? Also which country has been involved in more foreign wars, Mexico or the United States? But its America right or wrong? Just wrap me in the flag and I can do no wrong!
_____________________________
Three Nails to protect us!
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/17/2008 8:19:23 PM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 717
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
The extremist Chicano movement has actually lost steam. People are more into pride of their heritage than into a seccessionist movement. I am not saying that the crazies don't exist I'm just saying that they are being marginalized more. But the crazies are what get the news coverage giving the rest of the nation a false picture. Well over 50% of Mexican citizens believe that California, Texas, New Mexcio and Arizona rightfully belongs to Mexico. It is taught as a fact in school in Mexico. Regardless if the war with Mexico and the Treaty of Guadalupe- Hidalgo was the right or wrong thing to do, is the U.S going to sell back that territory to Mexico? I do not see that happening. Is Mexico going to contnue to see that as their land? Yes So what happens? I see a claim being made for a seperate "Palestine". And it will not be just crazies involved. quote:
What part do you disagree with? That there is more of a feeling of ownership of the land in conversation than a few crazies equal to the KKK on teh Mexicn side of the issue quote:
I'd love to hear of your experiences living in Mexico. Lots of great people and a great land but rotten government that will eventually push people to believe things are so bad becasue they do not have teh States I have listed quote:
BTW, are the results of your "extensive study" published? Or does "study" mean "from my personal experience and reading the news." Traveled a good bit years ago and read many things. Just not as eloquent as most.
< Message edited by TomTurn -- 4/17/2008 8:33:53 PM >
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/17/2008 8:23:07 PM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 717
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
General John J. Pershing in his zealous pursuit of Pancho Villa breached the Mexican border in 1916-1917. This being after the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo in 1848 establishing the present borders between the two countries. Was writing a reply to your earlier questions, as you posted this. See above for conversation on that issue quote:
The Mexican Army has never breached the border since 1848 Take a ride with the border patrol and you might rethink that. quote:
Also which country has been involved in more foreign wars, Mexico or the United States? Earlier you were almost to the point of being reasonable, now it is gone
< Message edited by TomTurn -- 4/17/2008 8:34:48 PM >
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/17/2008 10:33:26 PM
|
|
|
1dblthnk02
Posts: 414
Joined: 3/24/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TomTurn Take a ride with the border patrol and you might rethink that. I live in the land of the border patrol. This is the first I have heard of them ecountering the Mexican National Defense Army. Sources, please? . . .
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/17/2008 10:39:42 PM
|
|
|
1dblthnk02
Posts: 414
Joined: 3/24/2008
Status: offline
|
Ah! Nevermind, I found one here. It happened in a neighboring state, so I guess it made little fuss here. Still, I am surprised that more wasn't made of it; the anti-Mexican sentiment here is as high as TomTurn's. However, I find it highly suspicious that the reported incidents were close on the heels of 9-11 when national paranoia was running rampant. These are more recent. Sorry, but it just reads like stark fear-mongering to me.
< Message edited by 1dblthnk02 -- 4/17/2008 10:50:41 PM >
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/18/2008 7:20:30 AM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 717
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
the anti-Mexican sentiment here is as high as TomTurn's. "We tried to pin racist on him but he showed us we did not know what we were saying. We have got to pin this guy with a label to help destroy his argument" I am not opposed to there being a Mexico, their having a border. Am not opposed to there being Mexican people, so how am I anti-Mexican?
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/18/2008 8:00:25 AM
|
|
|
mapachito13
Posts: 1068
Joined: 10/1/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TomTurn quote:
Also which country has been involved in more foreign wars, Mexico or the United States? Earlier you were almost to the point of being reasonable, now it is gone Why are compararing cold, hard, facts unreasonable??? Answer the question!!! Or since you are blind to facts that don't support your claims, I'll answer it for you. The last entanglement the Mexican army had across its borders was with the USA during the Mexican-American war that ended in 1848. 160 years without a foreign entanglement! quote:
Well over 50% of Mexican citizens believe that California, Texas, New Mexcio and Arizona rightfully belongs to Mexico. It is taught as a fact in school in Mexico. Show me the facts!!! I'm sure that you were able to get your hands on some of this gov't sponsored propaganda to back up your claims during your time "living" there. quote:
quote:
BTW, are the results of your "extensive study" published? Or does "study" mean "from my personal experience and reading the news." Traveled a good bit years ago and read many things. Just not as eloquent as most. I guess that's a tin foil hat's version of "extensive study". Your debate pouch is kind of empty on your claims. So if a picture of a bunch of protesters hoisting a Mexican flag over a PO and empty claims is all you got, I'm done debating with you.
_____________________________
Three Nails to protect us!
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/18/2008 4:12:37 PM
|
|
|
1dblthnk02
Posts: 414
Joined: 3/24/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TomTurn "We tried to pin racist on him" No, "we" insinuated that you held an anti-Mexican sentiment, and you do. This demonstrates nationalism, and possibly even xenophobia, but not racism. quote:
I am not opposed to there being a Mexico You condemn, not condone Mexico with comments like these: "Lots of great people and a great land but rotten government that will eventually push people to believe things are so bad becasue they do not have teh States I have listed." Fear-mongering, akin to saying "They want to invade to take our women and our children and our land." Alien invaders from a land far beneath us: sounds a whole lot like the Cold War hysteria of the '50s all over again. Remember how the commies were going to take over America? Remember how much egg we had on our face 40 years later when we found out that the Russian arms race was just a bluff? Oh yeah-- and far from "burying" the U.S., the Soviet Union quietly fell into dissolution. "And if anyone thinks the bad element in Mexico and Central/South America will not join hands with the bad islamic element, I would ask them to think again." Here you insinuate that Mexicans, "the bad element," are in cahoots with terrorists. This is one of those bogus arguments that I so often hear for "closing the borders" to Mexico. Islamic terrorists will sneak across, with Mexico's blessing, to raise havoc in the U.S. (as if they really need to sneak in the back door) disguised as Mexicans because, well, . . . dare I say it?: Brown-skinned people all look alike to us. "Mexico has never been an ally with the U.S." The insinuation being: therefore, Mexicans cannot be trusted. But you are not against Mexico? quote:
Am not opposed to there being Mexican people . . . Not as long as they stay on their side of border, correct? quote:
so how am I anti-Mexican? For starters, you virtually hurl the word "immigrant" as a curse word. Second, you compare them to terrorists. Third, your words reflect an attitude that we over-generously deign to let them set foot in the Southwest United States when, in fact, they were here before us. I agree with you about one thing: this is kind of like Palestine.
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/18/2008 6:15:23 PM
|
|
|
mapachito13
Posts: 1068
Joined: 10/1/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: 1dblthnk02 quote:
ORIGINAL: TomTurn "We tried to pin racist on him" No, "we" insinuated that you held an anti-Mexican sentiment, and you do. This demonstrates nationalism, and possibly even xenophobia, but not racism. quote:
I am not opposed to there being a Mexico You condemn, not condone Mexico with comments like these: "Lots of great people and a great land but rotten government that will eventually push people to believe things are so bad becasue they do not have teh States I have listed." Fear-mongering, akin to saying "They want to invade to take our women and our children and our land." Alien invaders from a land far beneath us: sounds a whole lot like the Cold War hysteria of the '50s all over again. Remember how the commies were going to take over America? Remember how much egg we had on our face 40 years later when we found out that the Russian arms race was just a bluff? Oh yeah-- and far from "burying" the U.S., the Soviet Union quietly fell into dissolution. "And if anyone thinks the bad element in Mexico and Central/South America will not join hands with the bad islamic element, I would ask them to think again." Here you insinuate that Mexicans, "the bad element," are in cahoots with terrorists. This is one of those bogus arguments that I so often hear for "closing the borders" to Mexico. Islamic terrorists will sneak across, with Mexico's blessing, to raise havoc in the U.S. (as if they really need to sneak in the back door) disguised as Mexicans because, well, . . . dare I say it?: Brown-skinned people all look alike to us. "Mexico has never been an ally with the U.S." The insinuation being: therefore, Mexicans cannot be trusted. But you are not against Mexico? quote:
Am not opposed to there being Mexican people . . . Not as long as they stay on their side of border, correct? quote:
so how am I anti-Mexican? For starters, you virtually hurl the word "immigrant" as a curse word. Second, you compare them to terrorists. Third, your words reflect an attitude that we over-generously deign to let them set foot in the Southwest United States when, in fact, they were here before us. I agree with you about one thing: this is kind of like Palestine. Great post! BTW, you ever notice that no one is worried about the US-Canada border? It's twice as long and less controlled than our southern border and, as the guy that tried to slip through to go after the Space Needle in Seattle showed us, the terrorists know this too!
_____________________________
Three Nails to protect us!
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/18/2008 10:06:11 PM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 717
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
Why are compararing cold, hard, facts unreasonable??? Answer the question!!! What question? you made the statement "Also which country has been involved in more foreign wars, Mexico or the United States?" and I find it unworthy of the discussion. I could ask how many hundreds of thousands of citizens Mexico has lost in battle compared to the U.S. in defending other nations but it has nothing to do with the conversation. quote:
Or since you are blind to facts that don't support your claims, I'll answer it for you. The last entanglement the Mexican army had across its borders was with the USA during the Mexican-American war that ended in 1848. 160 years without a foreign entanglement! Have you taken that ride with the border patrol yet? I did when I lived in So Cal. The border was routinely crossed by the militaries of both countries. Mexican and Confederate troops often clashed during the American civil war In March 1916 Pancho Villa led a raid on the U.S. border town of Columbus, New Mexico, which was followed by the Pershing expedition. Do I think the treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo was a raw deal for Mexcio? Yes. Does Mexico as a majority think it was a raw deal? Seems that way. Is the U.S. going to ever sell the land back? Do not see that happening. Could a point be reached where Mexico decides it is time to make a type of "Mexican Palestine" claim, maybe attempt to take it to a world court decision. I can see that happening and I think the flag design and it flying with the first claims will happen in the next 5 years. quote:
Show me the facts!!! I'm sure that you were able to get your hands on some of this gov't sponsored propaganda to back up your claims during your time "living" there A Zogby’s poll found that 58 percent of Mexicans agree with the statement, “The territory of the United States’ Southwest rightfully belongs to Mexico.” Zogby International Am not a member anymore so can only link you to an article on Zogby, not the actual poll which read 58 percent agree, 28 percent disagree, and 14 percent were unsure Employer was Grupo Nair, do I have to supply proof of employment too? quote:
I guess that's a tin foil hat's version of "extensive study". Your debate pouch is kind of empty on your claims. So if a picture of a bunch of protesters hoisting a Mexican flag over a PO and empty claims is all you got, I'm done debating with you. Was unaware I was to post every book I had ever read. Am not debating you quote:
No, "we" insinuated that you held an anti-Mexican sentiment, and you do. This demonstrates nationalism, and possibly even xenophobia, but not racism. "Because their is underlying racism behind your race war fantasy." To which I had to point out that neither Mexicans nor hispanics share any physical commonality that can be attributed to one race. quote:
I am not opposed to there being a Mexico ........ You condemn, not condone Mexico with comments like these: "Lots of great people and a great land but rotten government that will eventually push people to believe things are so bad becasue they do not have teh States I have listed." Fear-mongering, akin to saying "They want to invade to take our women and our children and our land." Alien invaders from a land far beneath us: sounds a whole lot like the Cold War hysteria of the '50s all over again. Remember how the commies were going to take over America? Remember how much egg we had on our face 40 years later when we found out that the Russian arms race was just a bluff? Oh yeah-- and far from "burying" the U.S., the Soviet Union quietly fell into dissolution. "And if anyone thinks the bad element in Mexico and Central/South America will not join hands with the bad islamic element, I would ask them to think again." Here you insinuate that Mexicans, "the bad element," are in cahoots with terrorists. This is one of those bogus arguments that I so often hear for "closing the borders" to Mexico. Islamic terrorists will sneak across, with Mexico's blessing, to raise havoc in the U.S. (as if they really need to sneak in the back door) disguised as Mexicans because, well, . . . dare I say it?: Brown-skinned people all look alike to us. "Mexico has never been an ally with the U.S." The insinuation being: therefore, Mexicans cannot be trusted. But you are not against Mexico? Mexico has a corrupt government, just a fact. I believe the possibility is there for the "bad element" (criminal element) in Mexico to join with "radical islamics" Earlier when accused of racist ideas, as was mentioned above I had to point out to that Mexicans are not all brown skinned. I would think that a person accusing me of racism would know such. If I were "against Mexico" I would not have lived there or desire to see it continue or desire to see it improve or invest my money in it. quote:
Am not opposed to there being Mexican people ..... . . . Not as long as they stay on their side of border, correct? From an earlier post of mine "I am all for legal crossings whether to be a citizen or day worker. But the border must be honored.". I know it is difficult to read everything when you are blinded by bias, so no worries. quote:
so how am I anti-Mexican? ........ For starters, you virtually hurl the word "immigrant" as a curse word. Here is a word search result of each time I used the word "immigrant" "The poster said every immigrant. I pulled the name of one immigrant." "Immigrant - NOUN: A person who leaves one country to settle permanently in another." "My ancestors immigrated to the U.S. and were immigrants, that is true but I did not, I am not an immigrant." "baby born in the U.S. who's parents are here illegally. That baby is not an immigrant, that is the law." [they are citizens by law] Oh my gosh! look at that cursing (-: quote:
Second, you compare them to terrorists. Do you really want to go down this road after what you just read above? Sure, let's go A word search result of each time I used the word terrorist shows. Well it shows I never used it. But without doing a word search I do recall saying three or four times of the possibilty of the bad element in Mexico (they have bad guys just like us) joining with the bad element of islam (they have bad people too) quote:
Third, your words reflect an attitude that we over-generously deign to let them set foot in the Southwest United States when, in fact, they were here before us I did say there is a border today and that it must be honored. And I did admit to California, New Mexico, Arizona and Texas (my home) once belonging to Mexico. So not sure what you are driving at. quote:
You ever notice that no one is worried about the US-Canada border? Many people worried about it. Should get more press quote:
It's twice as long and less controlled than our southern border and, as the guy that tried to slip through to go after the Space Needle in Seattle showed us, the terrorists know this too! Should kind of make us more deligent on all borders. ...... We sure have come a long way from Sheriff Joe and the N word.
< Message edited by TomTurn -- 4/19/2008 7:55:22 PM >
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/18/2008 10:19:05 PM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 717
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
Have left something out in that 5 year claim that is very important, since none of you are mind readers I need to add it. It is my prediction that it will happen in 5 years, if the U.S. takes a strong stand against illegal immigration. If the U.S. continues in caving into it and bending and the like. Will be longer than 5 Anyway, call me stupid, redneck, go play with your tin foil hat. Does not bother me. But empty cries of racist, anti-Mexican and such, just does not fly.
< Message edited by TomTurn -- 4/18/2008 10:55:31 PM >
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/19/2008 9:53:11 AM
|
|
|
1dblthnk02
Posts: 414
Joined: 3/24/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TomTurn "Because their is underlying racism behind your race war fantasy." To which I had to point out that neither Mexicans nor hispanics share any physical commonality that can be attributed to one race. I stated very clearly in post #38 that you seemed nationalistic and possibly xenophobic, but not racist. quote:
Mexico has a corrupt government, just a fact. . . . A pointless fact. No country lacks corruption in their government. quote:
I believe the possibility is there for the "bad element" (criminal element) in Mexico to join with "radical islamics" It is possible for "the bad element" in any country to join with radical Islamics, including non-Latino Americans. quote:
I would think that a person accusing me of racism would know such. Third time now: I am not accusing you of racism. quote:
If I were "against Mexico" I would not have lived there or desire to see it continue or desire to see it improve or invest my money in it. Okay, you've convinced me: you are not anti-Mexico. But I still think that you are nationalistic and possibly xenophobic. quote:
From an earlier post of mine "I am all for legal crossings whether to be a citizen or day worker. But the border must be honored." You might want to rethink your position on this one. An Islamic terrorist, or "bad element" Mexican could cross the border legally as a day laborer or prospective citizen on visa. Couldn't this play out in your 5 year prediction? quote:
Oh my gosh! look at that cursing It seemed to me that you protested "I am not an immigrant" as if such a label were beneath you or your forefathers. If I misunderstood you, then I am sorry. But along side of your 5 year paranoia and talk of the "bad element," my confusion is understandable. quote:
I do recall saying three or four times of the possibilty of the bad element in Mexico (they have bad guys just like us) joining with the bad element of islam (they have bad people too) Yes they do, as does every country, culture, and society throughout the world. Why on earth do you single out Mexicans? quote:
And I did admit to California, New Mexico, Arizona and Texas (my home) once belonging to Mexico. So not sure what you are driving at. That you act like we are doing them a favor by letting them into the lands where they have been for centuries now. It's like thinking that we are doing American Indians a favor by letting them stay in their ancestral homeland. Oh-- that's right: we ungraciously removed Indians from most of their ancestral homelands. Yep, this is looking more and more like Palestine the more I think about it.
< Message edited by 1dblthnk02 -- 4/19/2008 10:01:02 AM >
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/19/2008 10:48:38 AM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 717
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
I stated very clearly in post #38 that you seemed nationalistic and possibly xenophobic, but not racist. Nationalism - "Devotion to the interests of one's nation." - Count me as guilty on that Xenophobe - "unduly fearful or contemptuous of that which is foreign, especially of strangers or foreign peoples". - From earlier posts, "And good for those who come here legally and want to be a citizen", "Good for them and glad to have them", "I am all for legal crossings whether to be a citizen or day worker." (in regards to people in Mexico) "Lots of great people and a great land". quote:
A pointless fact. No country lacks corruption in their government. The corruption in the government of Mexico is one of the main reasons for people leaving there to enter the U.S. illegaly (and legally) and to many of our problems on the southern U.S. border. It rates high in the discussion. quote:
Okay, you've convinced me: you are not anti-Mexico. But I still think that you are nationalistic and possibly xenophobic. See above - and a hint, when in a hole and it is getting deeper, stop digging quote:
You might want to rethink your position on this one. An Islamic terrorist, or "bad element" Mexican could cross the border legally as a day laborer or prospective citizen on visa. Couldn't this play out in your 5 year prediction? Absolutely, which is one of the reasons why I opposed the recent amnesty plan that did not do background checks of any measure and why I support stronger enforcement of visa control, tracking of people on a visa's and the like quote:
It seemed to me that you protested "I am not an immigrant" as if such a label were beneath you or your forefathers. If I misunderstood you, then I am sorry. But along side of your 5 year paranoia and talk of the "bad element," my confusion is understandable. The comment was made "We're all immigrants, some of us just don't admit it", to which I responded "I did not immigrate. Still living in the country I was born in", gave the definition of an immigrant "A person who leaves one country to settle permanently in another", and followed that up with "My ancestors immigrated to the U.S. and were immigrants, that is true but I did not, I am not an immigrant. I do not fit the definition" As said before, it is difficult to read when you are blinded by a bias, which I think you have against me because you so much want to see something that is not there. (hole, digging, stop) If you think my 5 year idea is , kooky, makes me a loon, hayseed redneck and such. That does not bother me because I could be wrong (and hope to be). But it does not fit paranoia, as we will see below. quote:
Yes they do, as does every country, culture, and society throughout the world. Why on earth do you single out Mexicans? Because the conversation was about a "Mexican type Paelstine". But when it comes to "bad elements" all over the world joining other "bad elements" to do the U.S. harm, of course they are everywhere from all over the world. So what is Mexcio doing for their "ally" the U.S. in making sure that is not happening in Mexico and that there are not problems between our shared border that makes it difficult for the U.S.? quote:
That you act like we are doing them a favor by letting them into the lands where they have been for centuries now. Well, there has been a border in place since 1848 and I think today that border should be honored. But I guess the argument could be started by some that since it is "lands they have been on for centuries" and we are "doing them a favor by letting them into the lands" that our border and control of it is wrong and maybe want to start a movement for a retaking of the land, maybe a "Mexcian styled Palestine", oops, now look where the conversation has gone! quote:
It's like thinking that we are doing American Indians a favor by letting them stay in their ancestral homeland. Oh-- that's right: we ungraciously removed Indians from most of their ancestral homelands. Yep, this is looking more and more like Palestine the more I think about it. Did the Indians get shated by the U.S.? Sure Have the Indians ever had protests where they took back for a short time or attempted to take back a part of the U.S. they claim as their "ancestral homeland"? Yes Now imagine that being attempted by over (and just picking a random number) 30,000,000 people from Mexico. Would that have an impact? Could they make a impacting claim to the land in question? Got to go to work around the property now, more later if you want.
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/19/2008 11:04:30 AM
|
|
|
rcjames
Posts: 4657
Joined: 7/15/2005
From: Oklahoma
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mapachito13 BTW, you ever notice that no one is worried about the US-Canada border? It's twice as long and less controlled than our southern border and, as the guy that tried to slip through to go after the Space Needle in Seattle showed us, the terrorists know this too! I am not so sure of your reasoning here; if the KSpace Needle had been in San Deigo, he probably would have came from the South. Thsnks RC
_____________________________
Just a country Preacher's humble opinion
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/19/2008 11:47:06 AM
|
|
|
tracydolls
Posts: 744
Joined: 3/30/2008
From: Mpls, MN
Status: offline
|
Americans are gonna need to run past the fence they are building.
_____________________________
1Co 7:22 For he that is called in the Lord, being a servant, is the Lord's freeman: likewise also he that is called, being free, is Christ's servant.
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/19/2008 12:21:34 PM
|
|
|
EverLearning
Posts: 1827
Joined: 5/25/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tracydolls Americans are gonna need to run past the fence they are building. Care to elaborate?
_____________________________
Normal people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it." Engineers believe that "if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/19/2008 12:55:37 PM
|
|
|
1dblthnk02
Posts: 414
Joined: 3/24/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TomTurn Nationalism - "Devotion to the interests of one's nation." - Count me as guilty on that . . . and guilty of cherry-picking the most positive definition you could find: the one that is simply synonymous with patriotism. I was thinking more in terms of: "jingoism. The support of one nation's interests to the exclusion of others." quote:
Xenophobe - "unduly fearful or contemptuous of that which is foreign, especially of strangers or foreign peoples". - From earlier posts, "And good for those who come here legally and want to be a citizen", "Good for them and glad to have them", "I am all for legal crossings whether to be a citizen or day worker." (in regards to people in Mexico) "Lots of great people and a great land". Also from earlier posts: "Mark this date down and in 5 years from today what you are going to see over California, Texas, New Mexico and Arizona is a new flag of a Mexican styled Palestinian nation. Not that it will be that but it will be claimed as that. Trust me, the numbers are here, protests are already happening and will soon be followed by more agitation and then violence. And if anyone thinks the bad element in Mexico and Central/South America will not join hands with the bad islamic element, I would ask them to think again. Mexico has never been an ally with the U.S. Even in WWII they allowed German spies to operate within the country. There has been a rif since the 1840's and it will get worse and soon. Has been a long time coming." Such obvious fear-mongering can only be rooted in xenophobia. quote:
The corruption in the government of Mexico is one of the main reasons for people leaving there to enter the U.S. illegaly (and legally) and to many of our problems on the southern U.S. border. It rates high in the discussion. I'll grant you this. Mexico's internal problems are definitely part of the equation here. quote:
As said before, it is difficult to read when you are blinded by a bias, which I think you have against me because you so much want to see something that is not there. Why would I want to see something that is not evident in someone whom I do not even know? No, it is precisely because of what I did see in your words-- the obvious fear-mongering, etc. -- that caused me to draw some conclusions, albeit hastily. quote:
If you think my 5 year idea is , kooky, makes me a loon, hayseed redneck and such. That does not bother me because I could be wrong (and hope to be). But it does not fit paranoia, as we will see below. I do not name-call. Childish recriminations are the last resort of those who cannot defend their position by reason. As for paranoia, you are likely not clinically paranoid. The kind of paranoia I am talking about is an exaggerated mistrust of others, usually for flimsy reasons. Now, you may consider your reasons perfectly sound, but I happen to disagree. To me, you just seem paranoid about a Mexican Palestine. I agree that there are those Mexicans on both sides of the border who are nationalistic enough to desire what you claim, but I don't see any signs of it coming to pass any time in the foreseeable future, much less five years. It is certainly no reason for the "deport 'em all and seal the borders" mentality so often voiced by various factions in the Southwest. quote:
So what is Mexcio doing for their "ally" the U.S. in making sure that is not happening in Mexico and that there are not problems between our shared border that makes it difficult for the U.S.? Mexico is not responsible for our national security. Furthermore, I don't know what their laws are regarding freedom of religion and activism. Here in the U.S. they are at least guaranteed the ability to voice their views. Maybe we should be the ones taking action and setting an example by truncating basic civil liberties thereby knocking Mexican-American nationalists off of their soapboxes. Heck, the current administration has already crippled the Bill of Rights beyond all reason as it is; it's just a short step to doing away with them altogether. quote:
Got to go to work around the property now, more later if you want. That would be nice; thank you.
|
|
|
|
RE: Racial Issues in the News - One Stop Thread - 4/19/2008 7:21:07 PM
|
|
|
SovereignIsHe
Posts: 1914
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
General John J. Pershing in his zealous pursuit of Pancho Villa breached the Mexican border in 1916-1917. This being after the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo in 1848 establishing the present borders between the two countries. The Mexican Army has never breached the border since 1848. Now tell me whose respecting the sovreignty of another nation more? Also which country has been involved in more foreign wars, Mexico or the United States? Never since 1848? Are you sure? Been more than a few reports of Mexican Army crossing... More than likely drug related... And for that matter the government of Mexico in general doesn't respect the border... For instance... "Guide for the Mexican Migrant" puplished by the government of Mexico... Of course the southern border of Mexico sure isn't like the nothern one and the governmet of Mexico treats those attempting to breach for worse than America does... John
|
|
| | |