|
Aphobos -> RE: Questions on Christian doctrine (5/12/2008 12:10:49 AM)
|
"In essentials, unity. In non-essentials, liberty. And in all things, charity." This is one of my favorite sayings. It is popular within the Anglican Church. I'm not sure who originally said or wrote it. Over the years, it has been attributed to Augustine, Melancthon, Wesley, and still others. Regardless of the source, it is a profound and deeply significant statement -- one that should be adopted by all Christians at all times. It establishes the importance of doctrine within the context of relationship. Broadly, there are three categories of doctrine with which the Christian must contend: essential, non-essential, and heretical. It is vitally important that the he discern one from the other. Else there can be no peace within the body of Christ and no unified defense against her enemies without. Let me explain. Essentials While Christianity is much more than a set of propositions, it is certainly not less than that. There are some propositions to which all Christians must subscribe in order to properly be called 'Christian'. You touched on some of the more important ones in your opening paragraph. I think the Apostle's Creed, properly understood, is an excellent if not exhaustive summary of essential Christian doctrine. Non-Essentials Scripture, history and tradition encompass much more than the essentials of the Christian faith. It has been said that the main message of the Bible is so simple that a child can understand it. Yet that message is found within the context of vastly more complex messages. While a child can easily discern the main message of scripture, theologians spend their lives wrestling with the details. For the most part, these are non-essential issues. Should infants be baptized, or only professing adults? Should Christians speak in tongues today? Does Revelation 20 have to do with a future millennial reign or a present spiritual one? These are all adiaphora -- disputable matters. No one's salvation depends on his/her position with regard to them. Thus, Christians are free to hold a variety of opinions. Heresy This third category is more or less an inversion of the first two. Heresy involves either the rejection of essential Christian doctrine or the elevation of non-essential to the level of essential. Sometimes, both travesties occur within the same heretical proposition. Those who hold heretical views are usually not Christian (though they vehemently claim otherwise). ***** In order to maintain peace within the body of Christ, believers must agree to disagree about certain things. Not every doctrinal dispute is a hill on which they must die. There is liberty in many areas of Christian thought and expression. The more we come to understand and appreciate our differences in these areas, the more interdenominational fellowship we can enjoy. We are, after all, one body. Yet Christians should not pursue this unity at the expense of truth -- especially when that truth may decide a person's eternal destiny. The church is charged with defending the faith once for all delivered to the saints. She must not compromise on essential doctrine. That is the dark side of modern ecumenism -- the vain quest for peace at all costs. There can be no meaningful peace when truth lies slain at the altar. Sadly, this is exactly what many in the ecumenical movement have done. Knowing the difference between essential doctrine, non-essential doctrine, and heresy will help the Christian to grow and mature in the community of faith. And if enough Christians do that, who knows? Maybe the visible church will be so strong and effective as to make the Devil stand up and take notice. It's been a very long time since that's happened. In Christ, ~Aphobos
|
|
|
|