|
blessedinnyc -> RE: Gas Prices..Who is to blame? (5/12/2008 2:11:55 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: rcjames I guess that I would blame the folks who have resisted nuclear power plants, placing wind generator farms in thier neighbors or off their coast, fought and stopped oil exploration off the Atlantic and Pacific coast, the north slop, Anwar, developing clean oil shale production, clean coal reserves in Colorado, Nebraska, and other states in the west, etc. And do not forget that there have been no refineries built in over 30 years because of suits by the same folks. Before you complain Ted Kennedy, many of these people are also Republicans. I, personally, would be happy letting a nuclear plant be built across the street from me if it were a relatively safe Light water reactor with a 4 ft-thick concrete containment dome- like all of the existing commercial plants in the US, and we could solve the country's energy problems this way. Alas, the problem is much more complicated. If everyone on this planet consumed as much oil as Americans do (this is the direction the world is heading in), we would have to produce 450 million barrels of oil per day. This is five times the 85 million barrels per day we produce now, and would likely take roughly 500 discoveries on the order of the elephant we found off the coast of Brazil- every ten years. In reality, this isn't happening. So more oil really isn't the answer. Nuclear is a great solution, but how do we translate that energy into stuff that can power your car? Well, that would be those hippie electric cars that only crazy liberals drive and want to provide research for. quote:
Those folks for the vast vast majority are liberals and demokrats. How did I guess you were going to go here. The truth is that NIMBYism is a problem for both Democrats and Republicans. The only difference is that Democrats also advocate reducing consumption. Even Al Gore, the evil occasional user of private jets, drives a hybrid, uses CFLs in his home, and has those unsightly solar panels on his property. quote:
The main excuse now is that it would take 15 years for some of these areas to become productive and up to 20 years for the nuclear power plants to come on line. It would take a little under 10 between the CEO making the decision to start operating a plant and the plant coming online. In fact several new plants are expected to come online by 2015 based on decisions made in 2005. quote:
But these are the same folks that 15 or 30 years in the past blocked the same energy independent ideas. That where the fault lies. Now the pressure is from world wide industrial growth, population growth, OPEC, and do not forget the speculators. We have the eneegy reserves to be oil independent for over 50 years and in that time could develop alternative energy sources. Actually, we are about to bury enough U-238 in Yucca Mountain to power the US, at current levels of energy consumption, for 200 years. Of course, it would take about $1 Trillion worth of infrastructure to do this. If we were to have a $2/gallon tax on both diesel and gasoline for three years, we could pay for it all. At the end of the day, the NIMBYs may be at fault for blocking solutions, but it's ultimately consumption and an entitlement mentality about $1.25/gallon gasoline that are the problems.
|
|
|
|