|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login | |
|
RE: What would you do? - 7/4/2008 10:16:51 AM
|
|
|
pbaribeault
Posts: 1086
Joined: 4/29/2005
Status: online
|
That's an interesting perspective, shadowspring. I think we'll have to disagree, although I think I should have said 'influence' what they want to do, not change it. I meant that parents do have a lot to do with character shaping, and good character will prevent a lot more troubles than constant supervision. I think that if a child is in clearly in need of constant supervision, then most every-day attempts at supervision are unlikely to work. And even if they do, that's not the complete picture of what a parent would need to be doing in that scenario. They would need to be doing a lot of consiquence-education and character work, alongside control strategies. Wishful thinking says that they should have been considering that strategy as a foundation. And I would have thought constant supervision would be impossible. I'm sure that you don't mean that one of your dd's hosts sat up all night in her bedroom with her? Because that would be creepy. I'm also fairly convinced that they would have let her have private washroom breaks. Did they send her to school (or maybe it was a homeschool exchange?) because there are a lot of opportunities for privacy in an ordinary 'supervised' school setting. If your daughter was determined to do wrong, she could have found a way to carry on a drug habit, alcoholism, or promiscuity under these circumstances. Therefore if I thought her character was such that she would want to be doing that sort of thing, I would not have let her go. I assume that you assessed what kind of a young woman she is and determined that she would not be actively perusing wrong choices. Therefore you could trust her. That's why it's surprising that parents think that they can "trust" that anybody's supervision is going to stop this kind of thing. I think it's a false trust, and unwise if the young person's character is not trustworthy in itself. If the young person's character is trustworthy enough not to seek to do wrong, then all that needs to be prevented is those impulsive flashes of opportunity-based bad choices. (In the case of the sleep-over, offering to do drive-by checks herself, plus a cell phone, would have provided a 'hall supervision' level of deterrent for this.) On the other hand, I don't think it's wise to prevent all opportunities to make bad choices, and/or all situations of risk of danger. These can be (very painful) learning experiences which reinforce good values.
|
|
|
|
RE: What would you do? - 7/8/2008 8:12:34 PM
|
|
|
LivePrayDream
Posts: 36
Joined: 6/20/2008
Status: offline
|
if my child often proved to me that they were irresponsible and immature, then harder discipline will be enforced. I hope that my child, however, won't end up like this because I don't plan on sheltering her or censoring her life. I realize that my child is her own person and she needs to grow to be her own adult person. If we had continued misbehavior or forgetfulness, I would want to sit down and discuss with her how she is feeling and what is leading up to this, and make a good compromise with her. If necessary, I would take her to a doctor if I suspected anything major since ADD runs in the family, so this could be a likely cause. I hope that my relationship with my child will turn out to be like mine and my mother's. I can talk to her about anything and always have, and there was no rebellion to be had because she didn't give me anything to rebel against.
|
|
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|